I, KENNETH JAMES LANDAUS, of GOLDEN BAY, NEW ZEALAND

 

Being:             Sole applicant of PLA 31 2583 (Mining Act 1971),

Principal and co-applicant of ML 32 3021 (Mining Act 1971),

Principal and co-applicant of MPA 41 452 (Crown Minerals Act 1991);

 

Herein include my Statement of Claims against the Crown.

 

Originally prepared by K.J. Landaus: 1998

Last updated : 31 July 2007

 

INTRODUCTION

 

Where applicable, I have tried keeping the statutory concept whereby those licences or applications that were retained under the Mining Act 1971, have still to be considered subject to certain provisions of Part II of the Crown Minerals Act.

 

I allege:

 

The matters herein relate specifically to the below mentioned applications and privileges.

Because the Ministry allegedly failed to decide on PLA 31 2583 until the enactment of the Ngai Tahu (Pounamu Vesting) Bill 1997 and Crown Minerals allegedly failed to provide me with my statutory right under the ‘Vesting Act’ and mining Acts to make application for a new license relating to ML 32 3021, then I consider these claims as unique and are not to be confused with any other related litigation.

 

One can only hope and presume, both Parliament, on passing the Bill and the Governor General, signing it into statutory law, took into consideration the specific clauses in both Section’s 3 and 5 of the Ngai Tahu (Pounamu Vesting) Bill.

Both these lead with (3.) “Notwithstanding any other enactment” and (5.) “Notwithstanding anything in the Crown Minerals Act 1991”.

IF UPHELD, these provisions would directly protect the rights to all existing privilege holders.

Specifically in consideration to Part 111, General Provisions, Section 43 of the Mining Act 1971. 

 

The principle claims relate to:

 

Prospecting Licence Application 31 2583                                                    Ref: P8 - 398

 

The Crowns failure to process this application subject to the Mining Act 1971 and their refusal to recognise or accept my claims that they have failed their statutory responsibilities by not doing so.

In particular I allege the Crown has breached Section 109 of the Mining Act 1971 and thus have committed a continuing offence under Section 234 of that Act.

Crown Minerals and the Secretary of Commerce have stressed that S.69 of the MA Act provides the power to grant a mining license and also allows the Minister of Energy wide discretionary powers.

Section 69 of the MA Act is specific to mining licenses; it does not however confer on the Minister the right to disregard other provisions of the Act.

 

S.48  (Prospecting Licences), of the MA Act is specific to this application and although subject to his discretion and conditions, subsection (1) clearly indicates the Minister is also subject to the other provisions of the said Act.

 The provisions in this case being S.109 (1,2,3), of the MA Act 1971, notwithstanding the enactments of the Ngai Tahu (Pounamu Vesting) Act 1997; S.3 and S.5, both stating in part; “ notwithstanding any other enactment ”.

 

This and other matters are raised in the PLA 31 2583 section of this document.

 

Mining Licence 32 3021 & Application for Renewal (New License)            See alleged legal interpretation according to the Acts

 

Mining Permit Application 45 412